From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palpal-Latoc v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 1, 2016
No. 14-72520 (9th Cir. Aug. 1, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-72520

08-01-2016

CATHERINE QUINOLA PALPAL-LATOC, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A079-300-183 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Catherine Quinola Palpal-Latoc, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying her applications for adjustment of status and a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i). We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Palpal-Latoc's contention that her due process rights were violated by the IJ's bias, because Palpal-Latoc did not raise this contention in her brief to the BIA. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an alien's administrative proceedings before the agency).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Palpal-Latoc v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 1, 2016
No. 14-72520 (9th Cir. Aug. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Palpal-Latoc v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE QUINOLA PALPAL-LATOC, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 1, 2016

Citations

No. 14-72520 (9th Cir. Aug. 1, 2016)