From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palomino v. Cuyahoga Cnty.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Apr 11, 2022
1:21-cv-2139 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-2139

04-11-2022

NOVELLE PALOMINO Plaintiff, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On November 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed the above-filed action. Since that filing, the record does not indicate that Plaintiff has served all the named Defendants.

Once a plaintiff has commenced an action in the federal courts, the burden is upon that party to obtain service of process upon each defendant. To effectuate service upon a defendant, the plaintiff is required by the Civil Rules to act in a reasonable and diligent manner, as governed by Federal Civil Procedure Rule 4(m).

Because there is nothing in the record to show why service upon all the Defendants has not yet been completed, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to serve the above-mentioned Defendants, or file a Federal Civil Procedure Rule 21 motion to dismiss those Defendants from this case within 14 days.

Cf. Stapleton v. Vicente, No. 5:18-CV-504, 2019 WL 2494564, at *1 (E.D. Ky. June 14, 2019) (discussing Rule 21 dismissals).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Palomino v. Cuyahoga Cnty.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio
Apr 11, 2022
1:21-cv-2139 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Palomino v. Cuyahoga Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:NOVELLE PALOMINO Plaintiff, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio

Date published: Apr 11, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-2139 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2022)