Palmer v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Full title: HUBERT PALMER, III, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-4726-M-BK (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-4726-M-BK

09-30-2014

HUBERT PALMER, III, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

THE HONORABLE BARBARA M.G. LYNN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. Plaintiff filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court CERTIFIES that, in the event Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis, any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation. See Bough v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

SO ORDERED this 30 day of Sptember, 2014

/s/_________

THE HONORABLE BARBARA M.G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE