Opinion
Civil No. 04-1330-HA.
August 1, 2006
ORDER
On July 6, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [33] and defendant's Motion to Strike [40]. During oral argument, plaintiff's counsel conceded that defendants are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity with respect to plaintiff's State law claims.
Therefore, the Court grants defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to plaintiff's State law claims. In all other respects, defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [33] is denied.
Defendant's Motion to Strike [40] is denied.