From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Dec 4, 2003
No. 03-03-00071-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2003)

Opinion

No. 03-03-00071-CR

Filed December 4, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Bell County, 27th Judicial District No. 53,037, Honorable Joe Carroll, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices B.A. SMITH and PATTERSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant Eddie Wayne Palmer pleaded guilty to stealing property worth more than $1500. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (West 2003). The court adjudged him guilty and sentenced him to two years in state jail. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and he was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Palmer v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Dec 4, 2003
No. 03-03-00071-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2003)
Case details for

Palmer v. State

Case Details

Full title:EDDIE WAYNE PALMER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Dec 4, 2003

Citations

No. 03-03-00071-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 4, 2003)