From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Rashawn

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Oct 30, 2024
No. 3D24-0730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2024)

Opinion

3D24-0730

10-30-2024

Markieph Palmer, Appellant, v. McIntosh Kemarley Rashawn, Appellee.

Markieph Palmer, in proper person. No appearance, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lower Tribunal No. 23-19800-CA-01, Peter R. Lopez, Judge.

Markieph Palmer, in proper person.

No appearance, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order on review dismisses Palmer's pro se complaint without prejudice based on Palmer's designation as a vexatious litigant pursuant to section 68.093, Florida Statutes, and failure to comply with the requirements of filing for a vexatious litigant. The order on review references that such designation has been affirmed by this court. See Palmer v. Robertson, No. 3D23-1499 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 13, 2024) (affirming dismissal with prejudice after designation as a vexatious litigant, where such order bars Palmer from filing any subsequent pro se complaint in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit "without first obtaining leave of the administrative judge in accordance with Section 68.093(4)"). Additionally, a dismissal without prejudice generally constitutes a nonappealable, nonfinal order. See Al-Hakim v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., 161 So.3d 568, 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Rashawn

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Oct 30, 2024
No. 3D24-0730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Palmer v. Rashawn

Case Details

Full title:Markieph Palmer, Appellant, v. McIntosh Kemarley Rashawn, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Oct 30, 2024

Citations

No. 3D24-0730 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 30, 2024)