From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Prevost Car, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 17, 2006
Civil No. 3:05-1040 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2006)

Summary

holding that plaintiff's "signature at the end of the contract and her initials on the page including the arbitration agreement evidence her understanding of the agreement and her intent to be bound by it."

Summary of this case from Soto v. F M Mafco, Inc.

Opinion

Civil No. 3:05-1040.

July 17, 2006


ORDER


On June 9, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the defendant's Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 3) be granted. (Docket No. 15) No timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the defendant's Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration (Docket No. 3) is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Prevost Car, Inc.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jul 17, 2006
Civil No. 3:05-1040 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2006)

holding that plaintiff's "signature at the end of the contract and her initials on the page including the arbitration agreement evidence her understanding of the agreement and her intent to be bound by it."

Summary of this case from Soto v. F M Mafco, Inc.
Case details for

Palmer v. Prevost Car, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE PALMER, Plaintiff, v. PREVOST CAR, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jul 17, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 3:05-1040 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 17, 2006)

Citing Cases

Thomas King, Inc. v. Jaramillo

Broad language binding a party to arbitrate all disputes has been held to encompass federal statutory claims;…

Soto v. F M Mafco, Inc.

Consistent with these rules, courts have enforced arbitration agreements, even in the absence of a signature,…