From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 24, 2022
2:20-cv-7242-JAK (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-7242-JAK (MAR)

08-24-2022

OKANG PALMER, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN A. KRONSTADT, DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Motion to Dismiss, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner filed his Objections, which have been reviewed, and are overruled. They do not warrant any change to the conclusions of the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Claim Three; and (2) Respondent shall file and serve an Answer to the Petition addressing the merits of the Petition's remaining claims within twenty-one (21) days of the issuance of this Order.


Summaries of

Palmer v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 24, 2022
2:20-cv-7242-JAK (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Palmer v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:OKANG PALMER, Petitioner, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-7242-JAK (MAR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2022)