From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Litherland

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 748 (N.C. 1793)

Opinion

(1793.)


When I was in the Common Bench, a question came before us, whether an administrator durante minore aetate, who wastes the goods, shall be charged after the infant comes of age. In 6 Rep., Packman's case, it is agreed that he shall be charged without saying how; and afterwards in the Common Bench, that he shall be charged as executor de son tort.


I deny this. For at all times he had a lawful power to administer.


I think like my brother DODERIDGE. He ought to be charged on the special matter. Postea, 810; Noy, 86; 6 Co., 18.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Litherland

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 748 (N.C. 1793)
Case details for

Palmer v. Litherland

Case Details

Full title:PALMER v. LITHERLAND. — Trin. 2 Car

Court:Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports

Date published: Jan 1, 1793

Citations

1 N.C. 748 (N.C. 1793)