From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 6, 1933
148 Misc. 324 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)

Opinion

July 6, 1933.

Appeal from the Municipal Court, Borough of Bronx, Second District.

Frederick C. Tanner, for the appellant.

No appearance for the respondent.


The present policy had the provision that it was incontestable after it had been in force "during the lifetime of the insured" for two years, etc. Here the insured died in less than thirteen months after the issuance of the policy. It was error, therefore, to hold that it was incontestable. The case of Killian v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. ( 251 N.Y. 44) involved a policy which did not include the words "during the lifetime of the insured," and is not controlling.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, LEVY, CALLAHAN and UNTERMYER, JJ.


Summaries of

Palmer v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 6, 1933
148 Misc. 324 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)
Case details for

Palmer v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:KATE PALMER, Respondent, v. THE JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1933

Citations

148 Misc. 324 (N.Y. App. Term 1933)
265 N.Y.S. 796

Citing Cases

Vance v. Life Cas. Ins. Co.

In passing on the question the Court used this language: "and it is not true that the two-year incontestable…

Matthews v. New York Life Insurance Co.

See Chicago Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Carbaugh, 337 Ill. 483, 169 N.E. 218 (1929); Greenbaum v. Columbian Nat.…