From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. HSBC Bank, U.S.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
22-cv-02178-VC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-02178-VC

01-18-2023

LAWRENCE PALMER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HSBC BANK, USA, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED

RE: DKT. NO. 151

VINCE CHHABRIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The motion to consider whether another party's materials should be sealed is denied. HSBC has not filed a statement in support of that motion, as required by the Northern District of California's local rules. Further, the Court cannot conceive of any argument for why sealing the material (in its already-redacted form) would be justified. Palmer is ordered to file the document on the public docket within 7 days of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Palmer v. HSBC Bank, U.S.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 18, 2023
22-cv-02178-VC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Palmer v. HSBC Bank, U.S.

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE PALMER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HSBC BANK, USA, N.A., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2023

Citations

22-cv-02178-VC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)