From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Everest Cash Advance, LLC (In re Palmer)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at Greenbelt
Aug 25, 2011
Case No. 10-35290PM (Bankr. D. Md. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 10-35290PM

08-25-2011

In re: DEBORAH C. PALMER Debtor DEBORAH C. PALMER Movant v. EVEREST CASH ADVANCE, LLC EVEREST CASH ADVANCE EVEREST LOANS LAW OFFICES OF HANSEN & ASSOCIATES Respondents



U. S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

This case is before the court following the filing of a Motion for Violation of Automatic Stay and for Sanctions filed against a payday lender, Everest Cash Advance, LLC, its associated entities ("Everest"), and the Law Offices of Hansen & Associates. At the hearing held August 16, 2011, counsel for the Debtor advised the court that a consent dismissal was to be entered as to Everest, the matter having been settled as to those Respondents.

The record discloses a number of outrageous violations of the automatic stay by the other Respondent that operates under the name of the Law Offices of Hansen & Associates ("Hansen"). Hansen appears to be a loose cannon operating on its own without any concern for the automatic stay of § 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code or the discharge injunction of § 524(a). Further, as alleged in the case of DiStefano v. Law Office of Hansen & Associates filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 11-CV02717LP, similar actions by Hansen described are violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 ets eq. The pattern of conduct described in this case resembles that described in the District Court complaint.

Seldom has the court encountered a more stunning example of violation of the automatic stay. The intemperate language used by the Respondent's employees demonstrated their determination to persecute this Debtor, notwithstanding knowledge of the filing of the bankruptcy case and the prohibitions of the automatic stay. It appears to this court to be a course of conduct that is wholly unacceptable. While the pre-filing conduct of Hansen was not a violation of the automatic stay, it was placed on notice at the time of the likelihood of the bankruptcy filing, as to which it acknowledged receiving notice later. Nonetheless, the willful violations of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) followed.

Appropriate sanctions will be entered, including punitive damages for the egregious conduct on the part of Hansen together with an allowance of compensation for Debtor's attorney's fees in bringing this matter to Hansen's attention and prosecuting the instant motion. See generally, In re Repine, 536 F.3d 512, 521 (CA5 2008).

cc:

Patricia McDonald, Esq., 13116 Ardennes Avenue, Rockville, MD 20851

Everest Cash Advance LLC, P.O. Box 7826, Overland Park, KS 66207

Everest Cash Advance, SCS Processing LLC, P.O. Box 636, Charlestown, Nevis West Indies

Everest Loans, SCS Processing, LLC, 4 Solomon's Arcade, Charlestown, Nevis West Indies

Law Offices of Hansen & Associates, 4200 Regents Street, Suite 200, Columbua OH 43219

Hansen & Associates, Inc., 9229 Ward Parkway, Suite 229, Kansas City MO 64114

Thomas D. Hansen, Reg. Agent, 4801 W. 110th, Suite 169, Overland Park KS 66211

Merrill Cohen, Trustee, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1103, Bethesda MD 20814

Jeffrey D. Zimmerman, Esq., 5819 Nieman Road, Shawnee, KS 66203

End of Memorandum


Summaries of

Palmer v. Everest Cash Advance, LLC (In re Palmer)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at Greenbelt
Aug 25, 2011
Case No. 10-35290PM (Bankr. D. Md. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Palmer v. Everest Cash Advance, LLC (In re Palmer)

Case Details

Full title:In re: DEBORAH C. PALMER Debtor DEBORAH C. PALMER Movant v. EVEREST CASH…

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at Greenbelt

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

Case No. 10-35290PM (Bankr. D. Md. Aug. 25, 2011)