From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 30, 2020
No. 3:20-CV-133-K (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:20-CV-133-K

09-30-2020

HAXANS WALDELL PALMER, ID # 18051523, Petitioner, v. COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, by separate judgment, the amended Application for Writ of Mandamus shall be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Petitioner's Objections to the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed on September 18, 2020, are hereby OVERRULED.

SO ORDERED.

Signed September 30th , 2020.

/s/ _________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Palmer v. Court of Appeals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 30, 2020
No. 3:20-CV-133-K (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Palmer v. Court of Appeals

Case Details

Full title:HAXANS WALDELL PALMER, ID # 18051523, Petitioner, v. COURT OF APPEALS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2020

Citations

No. 3:20-CV-133-K (N.D. Tex. Sep. 30, 2020)