From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Citibank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 19, 2022
22-cv-02180-VC (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-02180-VC

12-19-2022

LAWRENCE PALMER, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties have advised the Court that they have settled. Dkt. No. 144. This case is dismissed without prejudice. All deadlines and hearings in the case are vacated, and any pending motions are moot.

The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. If a request to reinstate the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel within 60 days, the dismissal will be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Citibank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 19, 2022
22-cv-02180-VC (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Palmer v. Citibank

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE PALMER, Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

Citations

22-cv-02180-VC (N.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2022)