Opinion
No. 71-56.
April 19, 1971.
Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition.
Michael Gora and Arthur M. Wolff of Wolff Gora, Fort Lauderdale, for relator.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondents.
On the basis of the briefs, the Petition for Prohibition, and the response thereto, we conclude that the rule nisi was improvidently entered and the writ of prohibition must be denied. See Kent v. United States, 1966, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1057, 16 L.Ed.2d 84, and State of Florida ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Booher, Fla. App. 1970, 241 So.2d 720, 722.
Prohibition is denied and the rule nisi discharged.
CROSS, C.J., and REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.