From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palm v. Teck-Mun Soo Md

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Apr 12, 2024
No. 370471 (Mich. Ct. App. Apr. 12, 2024)

Opinion

370471

04-12-2024

SCHRESE PEARL PALM v. TECK-MUN SOO MD


LC No. 2022-192259-NH

Thomas C. Cameron Presiding Judge Michael J. Kelly Allie Greenleaf Maldonado Judges

ORDER

Thomas C. Cameron Presiding Judge

The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal is DENIED for failure to persuade the Court of the need for immediate appellate review.

The motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED. The motion for stay is DISMISSED as defective, no hearing transcript having been filed. Presiding Judge


Summaries of

Palm v. Teck-Mun Soo Md

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Apr 12, 2024
No. 370471 (Mich. Ct. App. Apr. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Palm v. Teck-Mun Soo Md

Case Details

Full title:SCHRESE PEARL PALM v. TECK-MUN SOO MD

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Apr 12, 2024

Citations

No. 370471 (Mich. Ct. App. Apr. 12, 2024)