Pallekonda v. Pallekonda

1 Citing case

  1. Blount v. Blount

    No. W2022-01722-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 2024)

    This Court has affirmed awards of both transitional alimony and alimony in futuro. See, e.g., Pallekonda v. Pallekonda, No. W2023-00574-COA-R3-CV, 2024 WL 983162, at *2, *7-8 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 7, 2024) (discerning no abuse of discretion in the manner in which the trial court crafted spousal support to include transitional alimony of $9,000 a month for 72 months and then $7,000 a month as alimony in futuro, as "it was an entirely acceptable decision on the part of the trial court to conclude that Wife not only needed support in adjusting to the economic consequences in the immediate wake of the divorce but also that a subsequent award of in futuro support was proper"); Henry v. Henry, No. M2019-01029-COA-R3-CV, 2020 WL 919248, at *5-8 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2020) (affirming an award of transitional alimony for thirty months followed by a lesser amount of alimony in futuro); Edwards v. Edwards, No. W2011-02305-COA-R3-CV, 2012 WL 6197079, at *7, *11 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 12, 2012) (affirming awards of transitional alimony of $250 per month for three years as well as alimony in futuro