From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paliotto v. Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1955
285 App. Div. 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

April 25, 1955.


Appellant served notice to examine respondent Sylvia Hartman under sections 288, 290 and 301 of the Civil Practice Act. Prior to the date stated for examination, said respondent moved under section 291 to vacate the notice, the return date of the motion being after the examination date. She did not appear on the examination date, and appellant moved to punish her for contempt and to strike out her pleading under section 299. Both motions were heard at the same time. Appellant's motion was denied. Respondent's motion was granted in part and denied in part, the order providing that the examination be held after appellant has served a bill of particulars previously ordered by the court and that the examination take place in Nassau County where the respondent, a housewife, resides. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1174.]


Summaries of

Paliotto v. Hartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1955
285 App. Div. 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Paliotto v. Hartman

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO J. PALIOTTO, Appellant, v. SYLVIA HARTMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)