From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palescandolo v. Mangione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1969
33 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

December 8, 1969


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries by plaintiff wife and for loss of services and medical expenses by plaintiff husband, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 16, 1969, which denied their application for a general preference. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and application granted. In view of the extent of the claimed special damages and of the fact that such claim is uncontroverted, it is our opinion that the jurisdictional monetary limitation of the Civil Court of the City of New York may preclude adequate recovery by plaintiffs in that court; hence, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the application for a preference. Christ, Acting P.J., Rabin, Benjamin, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Palescandolo v. Mangione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 8, 1969
33 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Palescandolo v. Mangione

Case Details

Full title:IRENE PALESCANDOLO et al., Appellants, v. LOUISE MANGIONE, as Executrix of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Marrone v. Pathmark Supermarket

The action is to be tried in the Supreme Court. Considering the nature and extent of the injuries claimed to…

D'Alessio v. Arias

The action is to be tried in the Supreme Court. Considering the nature and extent of the injuries claimed to…