From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palermo v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 20, 2008
1: 05 CV 1010 AWI WMW HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)

Opinion

1: 05 CV 1010 AWI WMW HC.

February 20, 2008


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Doc. 19]


Petitioner is a prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On January 9, 2008, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein. Objections to the findings and recommendations were originally due on February 12, 2008. On February 6, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. Petitioner states that he did not receive the findings and recommendations until January 22, 2008, and needs additional time to acquire library access to prepare his objections. Petitioner does not, however, explain why he waited from January 22, 2008, until February 6, 2008, to file his request for an extension of time. Nonetheless, the court will grant Petitioner's request.

Accordingly, Petitioner is HEREBY GRANTED until March 15, 2008, to file his objections. No further extensions will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Palermo v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 20, 2008
1: 05 CV 1010 AWI WMW HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Palermo v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:DARIN A. PALERMO, Petitioner, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 20, 2008

Citations

1: 05 CV 1010 AWI WMW HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2008)