From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palazzolo v. Fessler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 2, 1996
680 So. 2d 607 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-03266.

October 2, 1996.

An appeal from The Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Claire K. Luten, J.,

Robert E. Wiggins, Palm Harbor, for Appellant.

Wm. Newt Hudson, Tarpon Springs, for Appellees Jack and Elaine Fessler.

Dennis R. Ferguson of Murnaghan, Ferguson Maguire, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Pick Kwik Holdings.


Ross Palazzolo, d/b/a Safety Harbor Chiropractic Clinic (tenant), appeals the partial summary judgment entered in favor of the Fesslers (landlords) in an eviction action. We have jurisdiction to review the portion of the order that granted the summary judgment as to count one of the complaint pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 (a)(3)(C)(ii). As to that ruling, we reverse because there are disputed issues of material fact regarding the tenant's rent obligation.

The order on appeal also ruled on the landlords' motion for summary judgment on the tenant's second counterclaim. Although this opinion may affect that nonfinal order, this court does not have jurisdiction to review that portion of the order on appeal.

It is not necessary to present a complete recitation of the facts involved in this commercial lease dispute. In order to determine the tenant's rent obligations, it was necessary to examine the lease documents. These documents are unclear regarding when the rental period actually began and when specified rent increases were due. Ambiguities in a contract create genuine issues of material fact as to the correct interpretation of the contract, and so preclude summary judgment. See Griffin Builders Supply, Inc. v. Jones, 384 So.2d 265, 266 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). "When the wording of an agreement is ambiguous and parties suggest different interpretations, the issue of proper interpretation becomes one of fact precluding grant of summary judgment." 384 So.2d at 266.

The lease documents were ambiguous and thus created genuine issues of material fact. Accordingly, the summary judgment as to count one is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.


Summaries of

Palazzolo v. Fessler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 2, 1996
680 So. 2d 607 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Palazzolo v. Fessler

Case Details

Full title:ROSS PALAZZOLO D/B/A SAFETY HARBOR CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, APPELLANT, v. JACK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 2, 1996

Citations

680 So. 2d 607 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Metromedia Steakhouses Co. v. USAA Income Properties, III Ltd. Partnership ex rel. USAA Properties, Inc.

The parties' differing interpretations of the termination provisions of the lease reveal that the lease is…

Entourage Custom Jets, LLC v. Air One MRO, LLC

See Campaniello v. Amici P'ship, 832 So. 2d 870, 872 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002) ("Where each side argues that…