From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1906
115 App. Div. 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

October 19, 1906.

James F. Donnelly, for the appellant.

Jonathan Deyo, of counsel [ Henry J. Goldsmith, attorney], for the respondent.

Present — O'BRIEN, P.J., INGRAHAM, CLARKE, HOUGHTON and SCOTT, JJ.


This was an action to recover damages for the alleged negligence of the defendant. Upon the trial, at the close of the case, by permission of the court a juror was allowed to be withdrawn. Thereafter plaintiff moved for leave to amend his complaint in order to enable him to set up with more particularity the defects complained of. The order appealed from granted the motion upon the payment of twenty dollars costs.

The order should be modified by providing for the payment by the plaintiff of all taxable costs to the date of the motion, for leave to amend, with ten dollars costs of that motion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs in this court.


Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 1906
115 App. Div. 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Palazzo v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO PALAZZO, Respondent, v . DEGNON-McLEAN CONTRACTING COMPANY (a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1906

Citations

115 App. Div. 172 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
100 N.Y.S. 681

Citing Cases

Smith v. Luckenbach

The rule frequently enforced in this court is that upon the facts presented leave to amend should only be…

Lifshitz v. Minsker Benevolent Society

See also Meeks v. Meeks, 79 id. 49. In the case of Palazzo v. Degnon, 100 N.Y.S. 681, a negligence action, a…