From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palatsky v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 11, 1995
896 S.W.2d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 65860.

April 11, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY, JAMES N. FOLEY, J.

Tammi Anne Milligan, St. Louis, for appellant.

James Artelle Chenault, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.


Driver appeals the judgment of the trial court upholding the Director of Revenue's action notifying driver that his license would be suspended for 10 years pursuant to § 302.060 (9) RSMo 1994. In his supplemental brief, Driver asserts that his petition for review was premature for the reasons set forth in Adkisson v. Director of Revenue, 891 S.W.2d 131 (Mo. banc 1995). We agree. The Director has no authority to suspend driving privileges pursuant to § 302.060 (9) until Driver files an application for a new license. Id. at 133. Premature notice of an intent to suspend issued prior to any application for a new license is a nullity and does not give rise to any right of appeal. Id. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand with directions to dismiss Driver's petition for review.


Summaries of

Palatsky v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 11, 1995
896 S.W.2d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Palatsky v. Director of Revenue

Case Details

Full title:BARRY L. PALATSKY, APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 11, 1995

Citations

896 S.W.2d 721 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Hancock v. Director of Revenue

There have been a number of recent decisions beginning with the Missouri Supreme Court's opinion in Adkisson…