From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palange v. Herbst

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Sep 15, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 83793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

Motion No: 2010-11378 2010-11447 2010-11448 2010-11449 Docket No. F-4345/07 M125824

09-15-2011

In the Matter of Dawn M. Palange, respondent, v. Kenneth E. Herbst, appellant.


, J.P.

RANDALL T. ENG

SANDRA L. SGROI

ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeals by Kenneth E. Herbst from four orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, all dated October 28, 2010. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated July 6, 2011, the appellant's time to comply with a scheduling order of this Court dated April 8, 2011, was extended until August 8, 2011.

Now, on the Court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements, for failure to comply with the scheduling order dated April 8, 2011 (see 22 NYCRR 670.4[a]).

DILLON, J.P., ENG, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Palange v. Herbst

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Sep 15, 2011
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 83793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Palange v. Herbst

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Dawn M. Palange, respondent, v. Kenneth E. Herbst…

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 83793 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)