From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palacios v. Zinaba

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jun 17, 2021
No. 2021-50560 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 17, 2021)

Opinion

2021-50560

06-17-2021

Miguel A. Palacios, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wentinda Zinaba, Defendant-Respondent.


PRESENT: McShan, J.P., Brigantti, Hagler, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, as limited by his brief, appeals from so much of the judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Bianka Perez, J.), entered on or about July 22, 2019 after trial, as limited his recovery to the principal sum of $1,554.80.

Appeal from judgment (Bianka Perez, J.), entered on or about, dismissed, without costs.

"It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal" (Babayev v Kreitzman 168 A.D.3d 655 [2019][internal citations omitted]). Plaintiff's failure to submit the relevant exhibits, including the invoice and estimates that were considered by the trial court in assessing damages, precludes this Court from engaging in meaningful and effective appellate review of the damages awarded (see CPLR 5526; Zapata v Yugo J & V, LLC, 183 A.D.3d 956, 960 [2020]). Without a proper record, this Court cannot render an informed decision on the merits (see Lynch v Consolidated Edison, Inc., 82 A.D.3d 442 [2011]) and this appeal must be dismissed (see Strohli v Strohli, 174 A.D.3d 938, 947 [2019]).


Summaries of

Palacios v. Zinaba

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department
Jun 17, 2021
No. 2021-50560 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Palacios v. Zinaba

Case Details

Full title:Miguel A. Palacios, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wentinda Zinaba…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-50560 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun. 17, 2021)