From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pakulski v. N. Y. Central and Hudson River R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

April, 1915.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff was himself negligent as matter of law, since there was no emergency, invitation or urgent motive, to excuse his attempt to board defendant's moving train.


Summaries of

Pakulski v. N. Y. Central and Hudson River R.R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 1915
168 App. Div. 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Pakulski v. N. Y. Central and Hudson River R.R

Case Details

Full title:Vincent Pakulski, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. New York Central and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1915

Citations

168 App. Div. 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)