From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pakideh v. Pope

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Aug 30, 2012
NUMBER 13-11-00792-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2012)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-11-00792-CV

08-30-2012

KHALIL PAKIDEH AND ALMA INVESTMENTS INC., D/B/A TEXAS ALMA INVESTMENTS, Appellants, v. WILLIAM L. POPE AND ADAMS & GRAHAM, L.L.P., Appellees.


On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on July 9, 2012. On July 20, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants.

Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Pakideh v. Pope

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Aug 30, 2012
NUMBER 13-11-00792-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Pakideh v. Pope

Case Details

Full title:KHALIL PAKIDEH AND ALMA INVESTMENTS INC., D/B/A TEXAS ALMA INVESTMENTS…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Aug 30, 2012

Citations

NUMBER 13-11-00792-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2012)