From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pajak v. Big V Supermarkets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2003
301 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-00633

Submitted January 3, 2003.

January 27, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), entered December 27, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against them, and upon the denial of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on the issue of liability, dismissed the complaint.

Zeccola Selinger, LLC, Goshen, N.Y. (John S. Selinger of counsel), for appellants.

Alan R. Lewis, Newburgh, N.Y. (John G. Caulfield of counsel), for respondent.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the jury verdict should not be disturbed, since it was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.

KRAUSMAN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, MASTRO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pajak v. Big V Supermarkets

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2003
301 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Pajak v. Big V Supermarkets

Case Details

Full title:MARY PAJAK, ET AL., appellants, v. BIG V SUPERMARKETS, INC., d/b/a SHOP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 639 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 877