From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paizes v. Sarasota Cnty.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Mar 3, 2021
313 So. 3d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2D20-2497

03-03-2021

Spiro C. PAIZES; Florida Home Improvement Services, Inc.; and James E. Chitwood, Petitioners, v. SARASOTA COUNTY, Respondent.

Spiro C. Paizes and James E. Chitwood, pro se. Frederick J. Elbrecht, County Attorney, Sarasota, and Scott T. Bossard, Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney, Sarasota, for Respondent.



DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Denied.


Summaries of

Paizes v. Sarasota Cnty.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Mar 3, 2021
313 So. 3d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Paizes v. Sarasota Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:SPIRO C. PAIZES; FLORIDA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES, INC.; and JAMES E…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 3, 2021

Citations

313 So. 3d 102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
321 So. 3d 729