From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paiz v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 13, 2011
Case No. CV 11-6481 CJC (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-6481 CJC (FFM)

12-13-2011

CHRISTIAN PAIZ v. DETECTIVE STEVE GARCIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Present: The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge

James Munoz

Deputy Clerk

None

Court Reporter / Recorder

None

Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:

None Present

Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None Present

Proceedings:(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff filed this action on August 8, 2011. On August 24, 2011, the Court issued an order warning plaintiff that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), plaintiff was required to serve the summons and complaint on defendant within 120 days of filing the complaint. That date passed over a week ago. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order why, under the circumstances, the instant action should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paiz v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 13, 2011
Case No. CV 11-6481 CJC (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Paiz v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN PAIZ v. DETECTIVE STEVE GARCIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-6481 CJC (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2011)