From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pair v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 14, 1974
295 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-343.

June 14, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Osceola County, Murray W. Overstreet, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Richard S. Power, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The order denying petitioner's motion to vacate judgment and sentence is affirmed on the ground that the allegations set forth in the motion are insufficient to show a right to relief under Rule 3.850, F.R.Cr.P., 33 F.S.A. The motion fails to contain any allegation that petitioner, who alleges that he was denied the benefit of counsel, was insolvent and unable to procure counsel at the time of his conviction in 1946. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the re-filing of a motion containing the necessary allegations. McClendon v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1973, 280 So.2d 703.

OWEN, C.J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pair v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 14, 1974
295 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Pair v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PAIR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 14, 1974

Citations

295 So. 2d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)