From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Painter v. Outlaw

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 18, 2009
334 F. App'x 47 (8th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-1937.

Submitted: July 30, 2009.

Filed: August 18, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Larry Blaine Painter, Forrest City, AR, pro se.

Earl Fletcher Jackson, Eastern District of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Federal inmate Larry Painter appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging a 1981 Missouri escape conviction, which was used to enhance the federal sentence he is currently serving for firearm-possession offenses. The district court correctly found that it was without jurisdiction to consider the petition, as Painter is no longer "in custody" on the state conviction. See Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 492-93, 109 S.Ct. 1923, 104 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989) (per curiam) (habeas petitioner is no longer in custody after sentence has fully expired, even if prior conviction is used to enhance subsequent conviction); Love v. Tippy, 128 F.3d 1258, 1258-59 (8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (petitioner who completed serving state sentence before federal conviction is no longer in custody under state conviction).

The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Painter v. Outlaw

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Aug 18, 2009
334 F. App'x 47 (8th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Painter v. Outlaw

Case Details

Full title:Larry Blaine PAINTER, Appellant, v. T.C. OUTLAW, Warden, Federal…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Aug 18, 2009

Citations

334 F. App'x 47 (8th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Painterv. United States

This Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to address the validity of the Missouri conviction because Mr.…