holding that a rebuttable presumption with regard to the contract rate "balances the competing considerations of maximizing judicial economy and ensuring an accurate reflection of the costs and risks associated with the secured lenders `forced' extension of credit. . . ."
Summary of this case from In re PledgerNo. 97-1349.
April 20, 1998, October TERM, 1997.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 121 F. 3d 436.
holding that a rebuttable presumption with regard to the contract rate "balances the competing considerations of maximizing judicial economy and ensuring an accurate reflection of the costs and risks associated with the secured lenders `forced' extension of credit. . . ."
Summary of this case from In re Pledgeradopting the General Motors rebuttable presumption
Summary of this case from In re Hollingerendorsing the rebuttable presumption approach of the Third Circuit in GMAC v. Jones, and adopting the coerced loan method
Summary of this case from In re Chiodoapplying Maryland law
Summary of this case from Saadeh v. Saadeh, Inc.Full title:PAINTER v. GOLDEN RULE INSURANCE CO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 20, 1998
. Id. (citing Sanchez v. Denver Pub. Schs., 164 F.3d 527, 534 (10th Cir. 1998); Yearous v. Niobrara Cty.…
Richmond v. Wampanoag Tribal Court CasesBesides the power vested in the Congress by the Indian Commerce Clause of Article I, § 8, cl. 3, the…