Opinion
Case No. 08-15027.
August 13, 2009
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL (Dkt. 24)
On July 10, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants to answer written discovery requests. (Dkt. 24). This motion was referred to the undersigned by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (Dkt. 25). On July 21, 2009, the Court issued an order requiring, among other things, plaintiff to file a response to the motion by August 4, 2009. (Dkt. 26). In that order, the Court made it clear that "[f]ailure to do so may result in sanctions, including granting all or part of the relief requested by the moving party." Id. Defendants have failed to file a timely response to plaintiff's motion.
Based on the foregoing, defendants are ORDERED to provide full and complete responses to plaintiff's discovery requests by August 30, 2009. Failure to comply with this Order may result in further sanctions, including an award of attorney fees and costs. The hearing currently scheduled for August 25, 2009 is CANCELLED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Order, but are required to file any objections within 10 days of service as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.1(d)(2). A party may not assign as error any defect in this Order to which timely objection was not made. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). Any objections are required to specify the part of the Order to which the party objects and state the basis of the objection. Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1(d)(2), any objection must be served on this Magistrate Judge.