From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paincare Acquisition Co. XII v. Colorado Pain Specialists

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 5, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01436-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01436-WYD-KMT.

February 5, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on "Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint" ["Motion," Doc. No. 55, filed December 31, 2007].

Defendant Colorado Pain Specialists, P.C. and Bradley Vilims, M.D. filed the above referenced motion with a certification pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1(A) that attempts had been made to confer with Plaintiff's counsel, Jason Gordon, but "counsel for Defendants did not receive a response prior to the filing of this Motion." Therefore, the time for filing a response having passed with no objection from the plaintiff to the relief requested by the defendants, the court will conclude there is no objection to the Motion.

Wherefore, it is hereby ORDERED:

The Defendants' Motion to Amend Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. No. 55] is hereby GRANTED. The "Defendants' Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint," attached as Exhibit 1 to Doc. No. 55, will be filed.


Summaries of

Paincare Acquisition Co. XII v. Colorado Pain Specialists

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 5, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01436-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Paincare Acquisition Co. XII v. Colorado Pain Specialists

Case Details

Full title:PAINCARE ACQUISITION COMPANY XII, INC. Plaintiff, v. COLORADO PAIN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-01436-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2008)