Opinion
Civil Action 22-3604
04-26-2024
JERRY J. PAINADATH, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA LATTANZIO, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
AND NOW, this 26th day of April, 2024, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 52), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 53), Plaintiff's Response (ECF No. 55), Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 54), and Defendant's Response (ECF No. 57), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Painadath's disparate treatment and hostile work environment claims based religious discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice. All discrimination claims based on sex and national origin discrimination survive. The disparate impact claim against Catholics also remains, as do the OAPSA retaliation and ACA whistleblower claims that survived the previous motion to dismiss. See (ECF No. 51).
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is DENIED.