From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paige v. Peake

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 10, 2008
262 F. App'x 272 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-7157.

January 10, 2008.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 04-1514, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court's November 20, 2007 order and requests that the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in Paige v. Nicholson, 05-1514 be summarily affirmed. Joyce P. Paige has not responded.

The Secretary appealed from the CAVC's decision, challenging the court's placement of the burden on the Secretary of establishing that a 38 U.S.C. § 5103(a) notification error was not prejudicial. In Sanders v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 881 (Fed. Cir. 2007) this court held that any section 5103(a) error should be presumed prejudicial and the Secretary has the burden of rebutting this presumption. Id. at 891. Under these circumstances, summary affirmance is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The judgment of the CAVC is summarily affirmed. The case is remanded for further proceedings.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.


Summaries of

Paige v. Peake

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jan 10, 2008
262 F. App'x 272 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Paige v. Peake

Case Details

Full title:Joyce P. PAIGE, Claimant-Appellee, v. James B. PEAKE, M.D., Secretary of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 10, 2008

Citations

262 F. App'x 272 (Fed. Cir. 2008)