Opinion
591 CA 17–01589
06-08-2018
Lynn PAIGE, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Robert PAIGE, Defendant–Appellant. (Appeal No. 3.)
LAW OFFICE OF MAURICE J. VERRILLO, P.C., ROCHESTER (MAURICE J. VERRILLO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. DUKE LAW FIRM, P.C., LAKEVILLE (SUSAN K. DUKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.
LAW OFFICE OF MAURICE J. VERRILLO, P.C., ROCHESTER (MAURICE J. VERRILLO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
DUKE LAW FIRM, P.C., LAKEVILLE (SUSAN K. DUKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Paige v. Paige , [Appeal No. 2] 162 A.D.3d 1521, –––N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2018 WL 2751557 [June 8, 2018] [4th Dept. 2018].