From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paige v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 30, 2008
Case No: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Case No: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT.

May 30, 2008


ORDER


This cause is before the court on Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability (Doc. 33). Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, Petitioner may not take an appeal from the final order denying § 2254 relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b)(1). Such a certificate may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

After review of the file, the court concludes that because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and for the reasons set forth in the court's April 22, 2008 order (Doc. 30) adopting and incorporating the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on September 26, 2007 (Doc. 22), a certificate of appealability shall be denied.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court is directed to change the docket to reflect that Walter McNeil is substituted for James McDonough as Respondent.

2. Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability (Doc. 33) is DENIED, and no certificate shall issue.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paige v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 30, 2008
Case No: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Paige v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM HENRY PAIGE, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

Case No: 3:06cv389/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 30, 2008)