From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paige v. City of Sterling Heights

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 21, 2005
474 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2005)

Opinion

No. 127912.

September 21, 2005.


Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal.

SC: 127912, COA: 256451.

On order of the Court, the motion to file brief amicus curiae is granted. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1) with respect to defendant's first two issues. The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument: (1) whether this Court's decision in Robinson v. Detroit, 462 Mich 439 (2000), overruled Hagerman v. Gencorp Automotive, 457 Mich 720 (1998); and (2) whether this case should be remanded to the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission for a determination of Adam Paige's factual dependency as of the date of his father's death, in accord with Runnion v. Speidet, 270 Mich 18 (1934). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatements of arguments made in application papers.


Summaries of

Paige v. City of Sterling Heights

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 21, 2005
474 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2005)
Case details for

Paige v. City of Sterling Heights

Case Details

Full title:PAIGE v. CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 21, 2005

Citations

474 Mich. 862 (Mich. 2005)
703 N.W.2d 800