From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pai v. Cnty. of Hawaii

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 28, 2020
CIVIL NO. 19-00440 JAO-RT (D. Haw. Sep. 28, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 19-00440 JAO-RT

09-28-2020

KEAWE BRADLEY DEAN MAHINA PAI, KAHEANA KATHLEEN KAWALE PAI, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF HAWAII, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOES 3-10, JANE DOES 1-10, DOE CORPORATIONS 2-10, DOE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

Findings and Recommendation having been filed on September 4, 2020 and served on all parties on September 8, 2020, and no objections having been filed by any party,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 74.1, the "Findings and Recommendation to 1) Grant Defendant County of Hawaii's Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiffs and 2) Dismiss This Action" ECF No. 59, is adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 28, 2020.

/s/_________

Jill A. Otake

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pai v. Cnty. of Hawaii

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Sep 28, 2020
CIVIL NO. 19-00440 JAO-RT (D. Haw. Sep. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Pai v. Cnty. of Hawaii

Case Details

Full title:KEAWE BRADLEY DEAN MAHINA PAI, KAHEANA KATHLEEN KAWALE PAI, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Sep 28, 2020

Citations

CIVIL NO. 19-00440 JAO-RT (D. Haw. Sep. 28, 2020)