From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paguada v. Optronic Techs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 25, 2022
22-CV-921 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-921 (RA)

10-25-2022

JOSUE PAGUADA, Plaintiff, v. OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, DISTRICT JUDGE

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same sixty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paguada v. Optronic Techs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 25, 2022
22-CV-921 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Paguada v. Optronic Techs.

Case Details

Full title:JOSUE PAGUADA, Plaintiff, v. OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 25, 2022

Citations

22-CV-921 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2022)