From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paguada v. Lacrosse Tech.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 16, 2021
20-CV-6379 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-6379 (VSB)

08-16-2021

DILENIA PAGUADA, Plaintiff, v. LACROSSE TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff filed this action on August 12, 2020, (Doc. 1), and Defendant requested, and was granted, an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint until October 16, 2020, (Doc. 9.) Defendant never responded, and Plaintiff has failed to take further action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, if Plaintiff intends to seek a default judgment, she is directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than August 27, 2021. If Plaintiff fails to do so or otherwise demonstrates that she does not intend to prosecute, I will dismiss this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paguada v. Lacrosse Tech.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 16, 2021
20-CV-6379 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Paguada v. Lacrosse Tech.

Case Details

Full title:DILENIA PAGUADA, Plaintiff, v. LACROSSE TECHNOLOGY, LTD., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 16, 2021

Citations

20-CV-6379 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2021)