From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paguada v. Beauty Care Choices

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 16, 2022
22 Civ. 2160 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 2160 (ER)

06-16-2022

DILENIA PAGUADA, Plaintiff, v. BEAUTY CARE CHOICES, Defendant.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

foe Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.

Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be “so ordered” by the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paguada v. Beauty Care Choices

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 16, 2022
22 Civ. 2160 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Paguada v. Beauty Care Choices

Case Details

Full title:DILENIA PAGUADA, Plaintiff, v. BEAUTY CARE CHOICES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 16, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 2160 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)