Opinion
No. 281, 2019
11-18-2019
Court Below-Superior Court of the State of Delaware Cr. ID 9911016961 (N) Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices. ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant's opening brief, the State's motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the Superior Court's June 10, 2019 order, which adopted the Superior Court commissioner's report recommending that the Superior Court summarily dismiss the appellant's seventh motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 ("Rule 61") should be affirmed. The appellant's motion was procedurally barred and did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 61(d)(2). We have previously encouraged the appellant to be mindful of Rule 61(j). We now warn the appellant that if he continues to appeal the Superior Court's orders dismissing untimely and repetitive claims, he will be enjoined from filing future appeals without leave of the Court.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F . Traynor
Justice
Page v. State, 2017 WL 3909123 (Del. Sept. 6, 2017); Page v. State, 2015 WL 428107 (Del. Jan. 29, 2015).