Summary
holding the Constitution "does not guarantee that there will be any government response to a petition or that the government will take any action regarding the relief demanded by the petitioner. Specifically, the First Amendment does not impose an affirmative obligation on the government to consider, respond to, or grant any relief on a citizen's petition for redress of grievances"
Summary of this case from London v. City of RedlandsOpinion
NO. CV 11-2255 CAS (SS)
06-05-2013
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and Plaintiff's Objections. The Court notes that in his Objections, Plaintiff states that "he has no objection to the Magistrate Judge [sic] recommendation." (Objections at 3).
After having made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation and having reviewed the Objections, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims in the Third Amended Complaint against Defendants Stefanoff and Siegl are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order by United States mail on Plaintiff at his current address of record and on counsel for Defendants.
____________________________
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE