From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Page v. Stanley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2012
NO. CV 11-2255 CAS (SS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

NO. CV 11-2255 CAS (SS)

11-09-2012

KEITH PAGE, Plaintiff, v. WARREN STANLEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,


CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint is DENIED.
2. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED to the extent that Defendants seek notice of state court dockets, proceedings and findings and DENIED to the extent that Defendants seek notice of controverted witness testimony to challenge Plaintiff's allegations.
3. Plaintiff's Request for "Leave to Amend the Third Amended Complaint" is DENIED as unnecessary because the Court is ordering Defendants to Answer the Third Amended Complaint.
4. Defendants shall file an Answer to the Third Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.
The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order by United States mail on Plaintiff and on counsel for Defendants.

______________

CHRISTINA A. SNYDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Page v. Stanley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2012
NO. CV 11-2255 CAS (SS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Page v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:KEITH PAGE, Plaintiff, v. WARREN STANLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

NO. CV 11-2255 CAS (SS) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

Alonso v. EL Centro Police Dep't

These allegations fall short of meeting any of the above exceptions to collateral estoppel because they do…