Opinion
2:19cv1345
09-14-2020
Electronic Filing
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Plaintiff initiated this action on October 18, 2019, and the Complaint was docketed on the same day. (ECF No. 1.) The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 65), filed on July 10, 2020, recommended that the Motion to Intervene filed by proposed Intervenor Applied Consultants, Inc. (ECF No. 52) be granted. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections, and that unregistered ECF users were given an additional three (3) days pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d). Objections were filed on By Plaintiff, Brandon Page, on July 24, 2020. Applied Consultants, Inc. file a response to Page's objection on August 7, 2020, and Page Replied on August 24, 2020.
After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:
AND NOW, this 14th day of September, 2020,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 52) filed by proposed Intervenor Applied Consultants, Inc. is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No.65) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated July 10, 2020, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.
s/ DAVID STEWART CERCONE
David Stewart Cercone
Senior United States District Judge cc: Michael A. Josephson, Esquire
Andrew W. Dunlap, Esquire
Joshua P. Geist, Esquire
William F. Goodrich, Esquire
William Liles, Esquire
Jennifer G. Berts, Esquire
Andrea J. Johnson, Esquire
(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)