From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Page v. Clark Refining Marketing, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
May 18, 1999
996 S.W.2d 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 75104

OPINION FILED: May 18, 1999 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 6, 1999. Application for Transfer Denied August 24, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

David Nissenholtz, Michael A. Gross, St. Louis, for appellant. James W. Erwin, Denise H. Bloch, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before Lawrence G. Crahan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.


ORDER


Dorothy Page appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's order dismissing her application for review for failing to comply with 8 CSR 20-3.030(3)(A) in that she did not sufficiently state reasons why the Administrative Law Judge's findings and conclusions were in error. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Page v. Clark Refining Marketing, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
May 18, 1999
996 S.W.2d 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Page v. Clark Refining Marketing, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY PAGE, APPELLANT, v. CLARK REFINING MARKETING, INC., RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: May 18, 1999

Citations

996 S.W.2d 678 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)