Opinion
November 10, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
"It is well settled that motions for leave to amend bills of particulars are to be liberally granted in the absence of prejudice" ( Simino v. St. Mary's Hosp., 107 A.D.2d 800, 801). Under the circumstances of this case, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in allowing the plaintiffs to amend their bill of particulars to add a newly-discovered injury.
Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.